Reproducibility is fundamental to science. Yet digital technology casts an increasingly long shadow on the principle. When independent investigators examine studies, they are unable to validate about ...
Editorial: Science rarely produces identical outcomes. Mistaking this for failure turns caution into an excuse for inaction ...
Three experts discuss lessons learnt from a large-scale dissection of the reproducibility, analytical robustness and replicability of published results. Jelte M. Wicherts is in the Department of ...
At a congressional hearing Wednesday, witnesses defended the scientific publishing industry while blasting the Trump ...
Scholars are debating the results of an effort to assess hundreds of papers’ credibility. Where some see failure and cause ...
Now part of Zimmer Biomet, Paragon 28 engineers created three novel instruments and a novel implant to make an ...
As demand for synthetic peptide compounds in British academic and biotech laboratories reaches record levels, Syntech ...
A multi-year study of the reliability of published social & behavioral science research has found that only about half of published results are replicated by new studies.
Half of social-science studies fail replication test in years-long project”: that’s the headline from reports on the latest ...
A pharmaceutical operations and Quality Management Systems executive and winner of an international business award, she ...
At amsight, this shift is described as building a “digital quality backbone”. This refers to production‑level quality ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results